Op Ed: How the CA Nurses are Failing All Labor


canursesforbernieBy Steve Maviglio
Special to Calbuzz

Bernie Sanders announced recently that he would launch a nationwide effort to help elect Hillary Clinton to the presidency, promising to fill up stadiums in key swing states. He’s headed to New Hampshire for Labor Day rallies and seemingly is pulling out all the stops to help the Clinton campaign.

Good for him. And it seems to be convincing his supporters to do the same: A Pew poll finds that more than 90 percent of his supporters are solidly behind Hillary Clinton.

Nearly all of his major supporters have gotten the message, except for one lone standout: the California Nurses Association and its affiliate, National Nurses United.

goregrimaceHands that Elected Bush For unexplainable reasons, the union’s leadership is still sitting on its hands. Or as Politico headlined its story on the union’s refusal to join the labor effort to put Clinton in the White House: “ODD UNION OUT.”

None of this should come as a surprise: this is the same union leadership that endorsed Ralph Nader rather than Al Gore in 2000.  We know how that election turned out.

At the time, well-respected Assemblywoman Helen Thompson of Davis, a registered nurse herself, called that move a “political and tactical mistake.” And when the Florida results were tabulated, that proved to be true, with Gore narrowly losing. And, something the union still fails to admit, along with it were lost the chances of improved health care for millions of Americans.

Yet that lesson seems like one the union may soon repeat. And the antics of the union — once held in high esteem for its publicity stunts that used to attract widespread media attention — are beginning to come into question from within the media and the labor movement itself.

DNCprotestersConvention hecklers Last week, Buzzfeed’s Cora Lewis wrote extensively about “the one lonely union that still isn’t on Team Clinton.” She noted the “radical” union’s behavior at the Democratic National Convention in Philadelphia where “representatives from NNU booed, heckled, and held up signs reading “Oligarch” to express dissent for the party’s nomination of Clinton.”

(Having personally sat as a delegate, in front of several members of the union’s leadership, I can attest to these antics, including disrespectfully booing First Lady Michelle Obama and even President Obama).

demorroandbernieMs Bomb Thrower Reported Lewis: “Not everyone within organized labor appreciated NNU’s tactics. One high-ranking public union official, who spoke on the condition of anonymity, said some within unions saw (CNA Executive Director RoseAnn) DeMoro as a ‘bomb thrower, not a bridge builder.’”

Lewis also noted that “The nurses’ stance sets them apart from their union colleagues — and far from the Working Families Party, a longtime bastion of Sanders support.” The Working Families Party voted to endorse Clinton after more than two-thirds of its members voted in support of that move.

The Communications Workers of America and the American Postal Workers Union, also backers of Sanders, also have endorsed Clinton. As has the Amalgamated Transit Union, considered by many as the most liberal union in America, which added its support last week.

Earlier in the year, major unions like SEIU, AFSCME, NEA went big and early for Hillary Clinton. They deployed active field campaigns in key battleground states.

cnaberniebusBussing Bernie’s backside  Not CNA. It deployed souped-up a “Bernie Bus” that traveled around the nation, burning through more than $5 million of union members’ money, funded by an independent expenditure committee, for which Sanders received heavy criticism. The bus’s main feature appears to have been for its members to take selfies with, and the union’s website still features a “Bernie Store” where you can order a “Bernie Sanders Head Tattoo” for 15 cents.

Even in the union’s home bastion of California and neighboring Nevada, the effort did little to help Sanders, who lost both states to Clinton.

Worse, the SuperPAC-ish effort sometimes left the Sanders campaign uncomfortable; and whenever Sanders tried to beat up Clinton for her SuperPAC support, the media pointed to CNA’s effort backing Sanders, undermining Sanders’ message.

This $5 million failure follows several other expensive political and media flops by the union.

chevronCNA double standard In late May, Sacramento Bee editorial board editor Dan Morain wrote a column about the union, questioning its commitment to progressive politics after it made contributions to a tobacco and oil industry-controlled political action committee. He pointed out that the candidate benefiting from the PAC’s contribution had voted against “one of the most important health care bills to come before the Legislature in years, one to require public school kids to get vaccinated.”

That candidate, known as “Chevron Cheryl” also is a backer of fracking. Yet union leader RoseAnn DeMoro says one of the leading reasons she didn’t support Hillary Clinton was because of her fracking stance. Go figure.

In late 2014, the union tried to take political advantage of the Ebola scare. At a press conference outside the governor’s office calling for increased protective equipment to prevent exposure for nurses (Brown didn’t attend), DeMoro was confronted by reporters who remembered her union’s opposition to legislation that would have required health care personnel to get annual flu shots or wear surgical masks.

A spokesperson for the California Hospital Association noted “If they’re complaining so much about getting protective equipment, why wouldn’t they support getting flu shots?”

 An indignant DeMoro refused to discuss the apparent hypocrisy.

JerryHill2Slashing innuendo Last week, the union was it again, when it attacked progressive Senate Democrat Jerry Hill, who has a 100% rating on his legislative scorecard from the California Labor Federation.  While he has been endorsed by for re-election by the union coalition, CNA essentially accused him of being a stooge for right-wing political interests.

“There is a chilling undertone to this legislation that parallels the anti-regulatory agenda of the far right American Legislative Exchange Council in seeking to eliminate regulatory protections that are critical to health and safety oversight on public boards,” wrote CNA co-president Deborah Burger in assailing Hill.

It’s that kind of “bomb-throwing” that reduces political effectiveness, whether it be in California’s capital or on the national stage.

maviglioCan CNA redeem itself? DeMoro told Bee columnist Morain that she shudders at the thought of a Trump presidency. Perhaps she can use Labor Day as an appropriate time to look at her history, and join the rest of organized labor to prevent a repeat performance of her 2000 Bush-Gore election antics.

Steve Maviglio is a Sacramento-based Democratic public affairs consultant. He served as press secretary to Gov. Gray Davis and was a Clinton delegate to the 2016 Democratic National Convention. 

subscribe to comments RSS

There are 5 comments for this post

  1. avatar Tam says:

    There is practically 1 political party in the US of A.

    It is the one for the One Percenter that has two factions:

    1) A very far right group of Republican Party called “Republican” and

    2) A moderate Republican that is not too far to the right nor too far the left called “Democrat.”

    So if you want Single Payer Healthcare and you would pick the Democrat, what would you get?

    Instead of the Republican private insurance version called Romney’s care, you would get a Republican private insurance style that’s called Obamacare.

    As long as this one unified system with two factions called Republican and Democrat that still prioritizes the very few elites with the expenses of general population, hatred, warfares, global warming, pollution, human sufferings will continue to persists.

    It is time to vote for the Green Party Dr. Jill Stein.

    • avatar Tigershark says:

      Jill Stein? Not going to happen. How many Green Party members of Congress are there?

      Not one of her proposals will become law without a Green Party majority in Washington.

      There is a difference between the parties; the Democrats passed the first major reform to our health care / insurance system in years, and the Republicans have spent the last 8 years and countless votes trying to repeal those reforms. There were never the votes to pass single payer. You want single payer, elect candidates to Congress who support single payer.

  2. avatar Silent Sleuth says:

    That is one of the stupidest arguments I’ve ever heard. It’s this kind of imbecilic thinking that allowed George Bush to win the presidency in 2000. If you liked the Supreme Court under Bush, you’d love it under Trump. I’m surprised the Calbuzzers would even allow such idiocy on their page.

  3. avatar kpminott says:

    Silent Sleuth!

    Certainly, there’s little reason for you to overstate your opinion.

    Let us bow our heads and, together, parse your point.

    “That is one of the stupidest arguments I’ve ever heard.”
    Ok. That opening salvo is believable, on your part.

    “It’s this kind of imbecilic thinking that allowed George Bush to win the presidency in 2000.”
    Hmmmm … imbecilic thinking won George Bush the presidency. I recognize a similar judgment within myself about third party spoilers. But, truth be told, Ralph Nader is not an imbecile. Ralph Nader is an egotistical jerk.

    “If you liked the Supreme Court under Bush, you’d love it under Trump.”
    That tone of sarcasm makes those fightin’ words. But, this fish isn’t in a mood to be hooked.

    “I’m surprised the Calbuzzers would even allow such idiocy on their page.”

    Harsh, Silent Sleuth, those are harsh words.

    You ought never be surprised by any op-ed from a CalBuzz guest writer such as public affairs consultant, Steve Maviglio.

    Surprise opinions off-set the characteristic deep, dark Calbuzz research, lightened by slashes of their rapier wit, CalBuzzers are brilliantly perceptive [could almost be prescient, in a Cassandra-like way].

    They are true champions of the written word. It is these attributes and more that we find Calbuzz charming and gossipy enough to want to hang onto every word.

    One point UP for Cabuzzers for running the guest contributor.

  4. avatar pjhackenflack says:

    Thanks for the kind words, kp, but the Calbuzzers actually agree with our guest writer. The way we read Sleuth’s remark, he’s surprised we’d allow Tam’s comment to appear. But we have no problem allowing most wrong-headed comments because they usually are easy to detect as stupid. You are right about Nader but the imbeciles we refer to are those who voted for Nader — like those who are planning to vote or Stein.

Please, feel free to post your own comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.