Dateline Moraga: Live Blogging the Senate Debate
Play-by-play below, but here’s the bottom line: Nobody “won” the debate which means Carly Fiorina did not do what she had to do — kneecap Barbara Boxer or force her to make a mistake.
Fiorina, a smart, articulate and attractive candidate stood toe-to-toe with a United States Senator and handled herself with skill and grace.
Boxer defended her record in the U.S. Senate and pushed issues like choice, climate change and gun control into the debate that put Fiorina on the defensive.
The single matter that emerged that likely will resonate most: Fiorina’s record of laying off 30,000 workers as CEO of Hewlett-Packard — in Boxer’s terms (not entirely accurate) of shipping those jobs to China.
Her response — sometimes you have to cut some jobs in order to save others — sounded like an eerie echo of the famous line from the Vietnam War: “We had to destroy the village in order to save it.” (That’s how it’s remembered even if it’s not exactly right.) And it wasn’t just a slip of the tongue — Fiorina said it in the debate and at her press conference afterwards as well.
We wonder if this will come back to haunt Fiorina: “This is the 21st Century — any job can go anywhere.” BTW, in the debate she said: “It’s an agonizing choice (for a CEO) to lose some jobs in order to save more.”
It was a clear contrast. Fiorina is a tough conservative who would overturn Roe v Wade if she had the opportunity, is opposed to California’s AB 32 climate-change law and would extend the Bush tax cuts for the wealthiest taxpayers.
Boxer is a die-hard liberal who is known as a partisan, pushes cap and trade legislation, would end the Bush tax cuts for the rich and is more worried about easing the way for illegal immigrants than she is about securing the U.S.-Mexico border.
Untested political newcomer versus career politician. Republican stalwart versus Democratic diehard.
The most baffling thing is this: Why won’t Fiorina, who sees AB 32 as a “job killer,” come out in support of Prop. 23 — which would gut the measure? Pushed at her press conference, she made all the arguments against Prop. 23 but refused to take a stand. All she would offer is that when it comes time to vote, she will take a position.
Also, what happened to term limits that Fiorina is so hot for? Never came up.
It was a lively debate, showed the ideological contrast between the candidates and gave viewers a chance to see both candidates talk and chew gum at the same time, so to speak. Carly was more tightly wound, but crisp; Boxer was more conversational but equally sharp on her attack points.
Boxer kept saying she’s enacted a thousand measures but could not refute Fiorina’s assertion that she’s only got her name on four bills. Not much for a 18-year Senator.
(Live blog begins here.)
Calbuzz went to the extraordinary expense of dispatching the entire National Affairs Desk to St. Mary’s College in Moraga (De La Salle Christian Brothers) to cover the Barbara Boxer-Carly Fiorina U.S. Senate debate – and has been promptly relegated, with the rest of the press corps, to watch the event on a giant TV while the real deal goes down across the way in the LeFevre Theatre.
Plenty of free parking here where it’s 97 degrees outside and TV correspondents are trying not to sweat on camera during their stand-ups.
Cookies too, thanks to the terrific St. Mary’s communications staff – chocolate chip, peanut butter, double chocolate and (ugh) raisin – along with a bunch of fruit that Calbuzz hasn’t the slightest interest in touching.
We’ll be live blogging the debate as soon as it starts in about 15 minutes.
6:57 p.m. KTVU, which is co-sponsoring the debate with the Chron and KQED-FM, just showed live shot of extremely sweaty protesters outside.
“Carly, no es mi amiga” vs. “Boxer, you’re fired.”
Inside the press room, Jon Fleischman of FlashReport, just called the debate for Fiorina.
7:00 – It’s on. Big hand for Carla Marincucci’s hair in the press room.
Boxer, wearing a gray pantsuit, is on the left. Fiorina, in a teal skirt suit, is on the right.
First opening to Carly: “I have lived the American dream.” Trying to give herself blue collar roots, even though her father was a law professor who was almost appointed to the U.S. Supreme Court.
“We need some common sense and problem solving ability in Washington, D.C.” First whack at Babs: She’s been in D.C. forever and her policies have been disastrous. Very aggressive in taking on the incumbent.
Boxer: “I’ve enacted a thousand measures,” coming right back at Fiorina charge that she’s done nothing. Whack at Carly: I’m working to stop companies from shipping jobs overseas. And, oh yeah, Carly got fired and took $100 million in severance.
Marinucci asks first question of Fiorina:
Carly says it’s all about jobs — tax cuts — Carla asks — small business owners are struggling — death tax — Boxer voted for taxes — to create jobs we need to make sure business is free from stangling regulation and taxation.
Boxer says 16,500 teachers got pink slips, what’s important than out children — my opponent called the bill a disgrace — but she doesn’t like it because we paid for it by stopping tax breaks from companies overseas.
Question 2: Scott Shafer asks Babs whether Iraq war “was worth it.” She says she opposed the war but voted for more money for troops and veterans. Credits Obama for getting out, and supports him in Afghanistan but supports hard time line to bring troops home “by 2011”
Carly staff is walking around the press room dropping off “Debate Fact Sheet” on everybody’s work station, challenging BB’s earlier assertions.
Carly on Iraq: Boxer’s “rhetoric doesn’t match her record.” Attacks Boxer for not voting for body armor, and also hits on her on small business legislation speaking government-speak gibberish about “TARP Jr.” and “TARP Sr.”
Question about immigrants: Carly wants to educate everyone but she’s against amnesty for people here illegally —
Boxer says she’s proud of her record on veterans — says Carly called immigration reform “a distraction” — we need comprehensive immigration reform.
Question 4 comes on tape from a guy in Oakland named Tim Tam who wants to know why Boxer doesn’t give somebody else a chance after 28 years in the Senate. Barbara sez “there’s a clear choice” and turns it to hit Carly: “We don’t need those Wall Street values.”
Fiorina says Boxer “mischaracterizes my record” on shipping jobs overseas. “Agonizing choice to lose some jobs in order to save more.”
Next question from Tom Watson, retired HP executive who bashes Fiorina with her record of “right sourcing” jobs and saying that no one has “a God given right” to a job. Great question.
Carly is now listing all the countries in the world – not to mention “Texas and Brazil” about….something…she seems to have been caught a little off guard by this.
Strong comeback on jobs by Boxer noting that Fiorina has opposed every jobs bill that’s come up since she started running.
Carly asks Boxer about famous incident when she asked General not to call her “ma’am.” She gives same answer as Calbuzz previously supported reported.
Fiorina comes back to say that Boxer is using H-P “a treasure of California” as a “political football.”
Randy Shandobil the moderator tells both of them to stop going over time, and get to the point and answer the damn questions. Yay Randy.
Shafer asks about gay marriage. Fiorina says marriage should be “between a man and a woman.” Says that because voters had such a clear decision “not appropriate” for “a single judge” to overturn. Umm, isn’t that why we have three branches of government?
So says Boxer, noting that America has a system of checks and balances. She cites Justice Ron George’s opinion opposing Prop. 8.
Fiorina gnomes just dropped off fifth fact check – almost make you think they had them ready in advance.
Boxer is asked about bipartisanship — is she too partisan — she says he works with Republicans all the time — a time line for withdrawl from Afghanistan is one example.
Carly says Barbara is long on talk and short on achievement — one of the most bitterly partisan — only has four bills with her name on them —
Carla asks about Roe v Wade — I am pro life, because of my personal experiences, her husband’s mother was told to abort him for health reasons — recognize that not everyone agrees with me — I am comfortable funding for adult stem cell research — but if embryos are produced for destruction then she’s opposed — says Boxer’s positions are extreme — has said a baby doesn’t have rights until it leaves the hospital —
Randy — Roe v Wade — she acknowledges she would overturn if she had the opportunity.
Boxer says she respects people’s — says Fiorina would criminalize women and doctors — says this is not about personal views.
Re. the “four bills” says she’s approved 1,000 Boxer provisions — you can see them online.
Shafer asks when Dems are going to stop blaming Bush and Rep congress for economic woes. Boxer says “we have” and are working on it…now she’s talking about the good old Clinton years and is blaming Bush for “the worst job creation record since Herbert Hoover.” “We didn’t get here overnight and we’re not going to solve it overnight.”
Fiorina: “Recovery summer has become the summer of despair in California.” She hits Boxer for voting for stimulus bill which she says “has failed.” Good riff on Boxer record of voting against balanced budget amendments: “Her record is crystal clear.”
Fiorina is asked if she thinks global warming is real or just a problem with the weather as she said in an ad — Carly says the ad was about military security — says we need a national and comprehensive energy bill — not answering whether she’s for Prop. 23 — we need to fund energy R&D — we cannot put bills in place that punish energy—
Randy re asks — Prop 23 — says her focus is on national policy — says she hasn’t taken a position — AB 32 is a job killer.
Boxer — if you cant take a stand on Prop 23, I don’t know what you will take a stand on — it’s a critical issue — my opponents is used to creating jobs in China, Germany, etc. – which would be the result of overturning AB 32 — “no bill I ever wrote superseded CA law.”
St. Mary’ student asks about ag policy. Zzzzz.
Fiorina now hitting BB on water – claims Babs “pressured” Feinstein to drop an amendment…
Viewer question – why do you think it’s a good idea for people on terrorist no fly list to have guns – what – are you nuts?
CF: “The no fly list isn’t particularly well managed.” We should not be taking constitutional rights away from citizens and giving them to terrorists – and that’s exactly what Barbara Boxer wants to do.”
BB: “It’s hard to know where to start.” Boxer trumpets her legislation letting pilots be armed.” Recalls watching debate where Fiorina said this and says Tom Campbell get excited “for the first time in his life.”
“Oh my goodness,” Boxer says Campbell said.
How about the assault weapons ban? Fiorina says it’s far too broad…Babs says dumping it “makes no sense at all.” Big wet kiss to Difi for sponsoring the bill.
Carly: She’s been struck by the “beauty” of California. Also fear, anxiety and uncertainty. Recounts alleged anecdotal conversations with people who don’t like regulation…very sappy yarn about some lady who said she’d never voted but registered to vote for Carly and “don’t forget us.” Oy. She’s for average people who “give a lot and ask for a little.”
Barbara: “This a very clear choice.” I’m fighting for jobs and she laid off 30K people and sent jobs to China. Made in America vs. Made in China. Someone fighting for tax cuts for middle class and someone fighting for CEOs and billionaires. Clean energy vs someone supported by big oil and big coal. Pro-choice – Fiorina would “turn a woman into a criminal” for having an abortion…Offshore oil. I fought for Wall Street reform and she acts “just like a Wall Street CEO.”
Randy apologizes for not getting to more questions. No worries man, good work.
Eagerly anticipating all the juicy tidbits!
why does carly fiorina begin every answer like she is the voice in a movie trailer?
“In a world…”
Babs debates like its her 500th such event in her entire political career.
That means she knows what she is doing. It’s a good thing.
Hurricane Carly sounds way over-rehearsed, so that is why she sounds like the narrator in a movie trailer who says what she wants regardless of the actual question. Just a tip: voters notice stuff like that.
I give this one to Babs…if nothing else she has Carly defined by the things that put her out of touch with the state. Fiorina can say whatever she likes, but she is now admittedly the pro-life, former CEO that doesn’t believe in global warming.
Both Whitman & Fiorina can’t figure out what to say about Prop 23, despite both of them claiming they will provide leadership, what on training wheels? Fiorina had no hesitation about laying off 33,000 Americans and sending their jobs overseas. Whitman had no hesitation when she got angry with a female staff person and struck her (settled out of Court). Both have spent decades not voting and promoting themseleves to make millions for themselves.
Boxer has had thirty years on Capitol Hill to accomplish something significant but mostly all she’s managed to do is be a loud target for the right wing. She has been gifted with lousy opponents but her longevity hasn’t turned her into an effective legislator. And regrettably for the nation, Fiorina makes her look good.
Karl-y does have a job creation plan for CA! Pay and regulate like China!
For starters, I thought Carly did a good job. She was crisp, concise, and on message. If she said “death tax” one more time, I was going to puke! I thought it was kind of a hoot that each candidate was running on the other’s record. I was sorry, however, to hear that the Boxer campaign didn’t refute any of Fiorina’s claims. So I will.
Fiorina said that HP prospered under her leadership and quoted statistics about the stock price, the size of the company, and the number of patents. But those who worked for her have a different take on her qualifications. According to a website started by “Thousands of HP and Compaq employees who saw Carly Fiorina’s mismanagement and lack of leadership” not everything she said was true. This one spoke directly to her claims:
Kevin Ms. Fiorina drove shareholder value to an all-time low. During her tenure, HP Central Labs submitted fewer patent applications than ever before in company history. As a direct result of the merger with COMPAQ, eventually approx 45,000 people were laid off worldwide. Meanwhile, she “earned” $100M in six years.