Quantcast

Posts Tagged ‘Jon Stewart’



Stewart’s Apt Critique; Jerry, Meg Final Barnstorms

Sunday, October 31st, 2010

Comic Jon Stewart provided some of the clearest thinking of this bizarre election season about the militant ignorism abroad in the land, speaking near the end of the fervently non-partisan Rally to Restore Sanity and/or Fear in Washington on Saturday.

“We live in hard times not end times,” he said, as Calbuzz couch potatoes (waiting for the first pitch in game three of the World Series) bestirred ourselves to take copious notes on Stewart’s implicit critique of the apocalypse-now voices of religious evangelism who argue that God’s wrath is the cause of AIDS, hurricanes and earthquakes.

“If we amplify everything we hear nothing . . . The press is our immune system: if it overreacts to everything we get sicker — and perhaps eczema,” he said, a knock at the 24/7 news cycle fear mongers whose quest for ratings renders them unable to modulate how seriously to treat any story, whether it’s a missing co-ed in Aruba, trapped miners in Chile or the war in Afghanistan.

“Most Americans don’t live their lives solely as Democrats, Republicans, liberals or conservatives,” Stewart said, arguing for civility in our political discourse. “Americans live their lives more as people that are just a little bit late for something they have to do. Often something they do not want to do. But they do it.”

And he warned those who expect too much too soon that real change takes time: “Sometimes, the light at the end of the tunnel isn’t the promised land. Sometimes, it’s just New Jersey .”

Here’s an on-the-scene report from Calbuzz Washington Correspondent Mackenzie Weinger:

Jon Stewart and Stephen Colbert’s Rally to Restore Sanity and/or Fear brought thousands of people to Washington, D.C.’s Mall – but did it bring the funny?

With just days before the election, the comedians’ three-hour rally aimed to infuse a bit of “reasonableness” back into political discourse, without ever mentioning the midterms or encouraging people to go out and vote. Rally attendee estimates ranged from Comedy Central’s 250,000 to Stewart’s reasonable guess of 10 million, and the event featured a variety of musical acts and comedic bits. But it also featured poorly placed jumbo screens, an ineffective sound system and some seriously dull moments from the stage.

The biggest entertainment of the day came from the crowd, many of whom dressed up and hoisted signs declaring themselves for “Team Fear” or calling for politicians to “Man-ner Up.”

Following a far-too long opening set featuring The Roots and John Legend, Mythbusters stars Jamie Hyneman and Adam Savage took the stage. The bit was a total dud, with the crowd lackadaisically participating in their “experiments,” including jumping and laughing on cue.

Things picked up once Stewart rolled onto the stage and introduced one of the more impressive moments of the afternoon, a group of four U.S. troops singing “The Star-Spangled Banner.” Colbert arrived in typically ridiculous fashion, emulating the Chilean miners as he was pulled up from his “fear bunker.”

The rest of the rally featured a mishmash of comedy and music, as Ozzy Osbbourne and Yusuf Islam played their competing songs, “Crazy Train” and “Peace Train” before The O’Jays brought the two together with their classic, “Love Train.”

The rally’s mishmash wasn’t always successful, however, and the poor sound system didn’t help matters. Rally-goers frequently broke up the event by yelling “Louder! Louder!” to no avail. Stewart and Colbert’s mock-debate went on too long, but a delightful moment came when Lakers legend Kareem Abdul-Jabbar waltzed on the stage while the two were talking about fearing Muslims. Stewart: “There are a lot of Muslim people you might like.”

After handing out Medals for Reasonableness and Fear and hearing from a smattering of musical acts, including Kid Rock and Sheryl Crow, Stewart wrapped up the event by turning serious. “The truth is, we work together to get things done every damn day. The only place we don’t is here, or on cable TV — but Americans don’t live here or on cable TV.”

Stewart and Colbert also used the event to critique the media and played multiple clips of pundits sniping at each other. “The country’s 24-hour politico-pundit-perpetual-panic conflictinator did not cause our problems,” Stewart said. “but its existence makes solving them that much harder.”

The rally ended right on cue, and people trailed off the Mall at 3 p.m. to crowd the streets, bars and metro stops of D.C. -30-

Meanwhile, out on the campaign trail, Jerry Brown kicked off a three-day flyaround at his headquarters in Oakland where SacBMinus reporter David Siders reported that Brown lost his train of thought while talking about jobs and the economy.

“I don’t like to say the same old, same old,” he said. “That’s one of the reasons I’m always getting off script. Some candidates feel very secure with messaged discipline. I get very bored with that, because to me life is a continuing discovery.”

Later, he said, “OK, I think I’ll stop there because I might say something I might regret.”

The Armies of eMeg quickly jumped on the item and sent it out to reporters with delight, suggesting that Old Man Brown had lost his marbles even before his campaign drive had even begun.

Meg Whitman Herself started off her own barnstorm in Costa Mesa asking Orange County supporters, “We’ve got the chance to make some history here don’t we?”  after driving up the the event in her green “Take Back Sacramento Express” bus.

“We have the chance to put a proven job creator in office for the first time in many, many years. We have the chance to create real change in Sacramento,” Seema Mehta of the ByGodLATimes reported. “We’re going to take back California for our children and our grandchildren. You know what else we have a chance to do? Put the first woman governor in California in office.”

Unless the polls that say she’s way behind Brown among women, Latinos and independents turn out to be correct. In which case, the only history she’ll make is having run the most expensive losing campaign for governor of all time.

After Oakland, Brown was scheduled to rally the troops in Stockton, Merced, Fresno and Bakersfield; on Sunday he planned stops in Eureka, Chico, Sacramento and Riverside; and on Monday rallies in San Diego, Los Angeles, Salinas and Oakland.

Whitman’s Saturday schedule took in Costa Mesa, Vista, Sacramento and Cupertino; on Sunday she was scheduled for Burbank and Santa Barbara, and on Monday she’s due to visit Woodland Hills, Santa Ana, San Diego and Temecula.

Press Clips: Hardnose vs Brown Nose Reporting

Saturday, June 26th, 2010

If the emperor has no clothes – simply avert your eyes: In a week when Michael Hastings reminded everyone what tough, hard nose reporting looks like, here comes David Brooks to offer a perfect glimpse of its polar opposite: brown-nose reporting.

As the world now knows, Hastings’ long-form piece in Rolling Stone not only uncovered a culture of arrogance, disrespect, and trash-talking of civilian leadership in the inner circle of General Stanley McChrystal, but also disclosed a festering conflict at the highest levels over U.S. policy in Afghanistan between and among senior military and government leaders.

But to Brooks, the mealy-mouthed moderate conservative columnist for the NYT, Hastings is simply a gossip-mongering ruffian without the refined sensibilities and fine feelings needed to appreciate and understand that matters such as a general’s actual candid words are never to be reported.

“The most interesting part of my job is that I get to observe powerful people at close quarters,” Brooks began (gag).

General McChrystal was excellent at his job. He had outstanding relations with the White House and entirely proper relationships with his various civilian partners in the State Department and beyond. He set up a superb decision-making apparatus that deftly used military and civilian expertise.

But McChrystal, like everyone else, kvetched. And having apparently missed the last 50 years of cultural history, he did so on the record, in front of a reporter. And this reporter, being a product of the culture of exposure, made the kvetching the center of his magazine profile.

By putting the kvetching in the magazine, the reporter essentially took run-of-the-mill complaining and turned it into a direct challenge to presidential authority. He took a successful general and made it impossible for President Obama to retain him.

Imagine – Hastings put it in the magazine. We can only imagine how much inside stuff Brooks gets to see and hear in the course of his days, but never bothers to share with his readers because then…he wouldn’t get to “observe powerful people at close quarters.”

This just in: Hastings fires back at Brooks:

More on McChrystal media: The pink-shirted, purple-tied Brooks wasn’t the only journo whose nose was put out of joint by the Hastings report. Jon Stewart’s crew put together a nice mash-up of Beltway MSM types tut-tutting about the bombshell piece.

When the camera cut back to him after the video clips, Stewart had donned a pair of black horn rims which he removed to solemnly announce, in best Cronkite-doing-JFK-assassination style: “At approximately 11:04 Eastern Standard Time, the American news media finally realized they kind of sucked.”

Politico also enmeshed itself in the thorny issue of journalistic ethical relativism, with a long report on the Rolling Stone piece that included this intriguing paragraph:

McChrystal, an expert on counter-terrorism and counterinsurgency, has long been thought to be uniquely qualified to lead in Afghanistan. But he is not known for being media savvy. Hastings, who has covered the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan for two years, according to the magazine, is not well-known within the Defense Department. And as a freelance reporter, Hastings would be considered a bigger risk to be given unfettered access, compared with a beat reporter, who would not risk burning bridges by publishing many of McChrystal’s remarks. (emph. ours)

In other words, a beat reporter would never be so craven as Hastings and actually report the truth – it might affect his access!

It’s instructive that a few hours after the piece was posted, Politico substituted a new version, with that very telling paragraph excised.  Jay Rosen had a swell time dissecting that move over at Press Think.

The Brooks/Politico journalism thought police were joined in their pecksniffian pronouncements by the Washington Post, which weighed in with a yarn quoting anonymous military sources accusing Rolling Stone of having violated rules of attribution in getting their scoop.

McChrystal was betrayed when the journalist quoted banter among the general and his staff, much of which they thought was off the record.

Hastings and his editor both vehemently deny this, but you can be sure that it’s only a matter of time before that view becomes received Beltway wisdom about the Rolling Stone piece. After all, if the story was worth reporting, surely someone worth knowing would have reported it.

Huh? Wuddhe say? Kudos to California Watch for their terrific new feature “Politics Verbatim” which provides horse’s mouth statements and speech excerpts from candidates in the 2010 campaigns. It’s a great resource because, with apologies to Joe Mathews, it really does matter what politicians say.

Because Calwatch is focused on the importance of language in politics, however, we were surprised to find this construction in their recent piece on Meg’s hypocritical new ad on immigration:

Republican gubernatorial candidate Meg Whitman set to work courting support among Latinos last week after a brutal GOP primary battle that forced her to take a loud and hard stance against immigration issues.

Forced her? Really?

Actually eMeg chose to follow Steve Poizner down the shameful road of immigrant bashing in the primary because she was far more worried about her own skin than in standing up and taking a principled position on the issue. And why not – she knew she could then just turn around and spend a couple million more trying to fool people into thinking that’s what she’d done all along. Forced? C’mon.

On the other hand, Joe: Hat tip to Joe Matthews for exposing some of the falsehoods in eMeg’s snappy 60-second, golden-oldies hit on Krusty the General. Under the Calbuzzworthy headline “Shocker! In New Ad Meg Whitman comes Out Against Prop 13″ Joe writes:

Should we feel sorry for Brown? Not in the least. By failing to level with voters about Prop 13 and the need to change the budget system it helped launch, Brown created this opening for Meg’s mischief. But Whitman is doing a disservice to the state and its voters (particularly those who don’t know or don’t remember the history) by misrepresenting a very important and relevant part of our state’s.

She should pull the ad. In the meantime, California TV stations, which have an obligation to serve the public, could honor that obligation by refusing to run it.

Say Cheez: The truth isn’t the only thing eMeg is doing violence to with her new ad:  Cheezburger Network, host of a batch of popular sites including FAIL blog, is crying rip-off. Cheezburger founder Ben Huh has issued an angry statement assailing the Whitman campaign for appropriating the look and feel of their “fail” schtick for the anti-Brown ad:

We want to make it VERY clear that FAIL Blog nor the Cheezburger Network had any involvement or knowledge of the Whitman campaign use of a screenshot of FAIL Blog. In fact, the screenshot portrayed in the video never existed because the Whitman campaign faked the content within the screenshot. FAIL Blog or the Cheezburger Network has never been involved in any endorsement of any candidate or political party and do not plan to do so….

We demand a written apology from the Whitman campaign and the removal of the video.

No response from Team eMeg on the demand.

No news is, eh, no news: Calbuzz, FlashReport and Calitics have received no word from Jerry Brown or Meg Whitman in response to our invitation for a Sept. 13 debate between them — with us as questioners.

The hall is booked at San Jose State; the university, the college of Social Sciences and Commonwealth Club of Silicon Valley all have agreed to sponsor. But the candidates seem: 1) too scared of this group of questioners to step up; 2) sure it’s a bad idea to respond before knowing if the other camp is too chicken to respond; 3) not entirely happy with Calbuzz for all our, um, irreverence about them; 4) all of the above. No worries, we have Plan B up our sleeves. Stay tuned.

Redeem this, buster: Just what do you have to do to disqualify yourself for a job in the fancy-pants world of network and big-time cable news? Judging from CNN’s embrace of disgraced NY Gov. Eliot Spitzer, it seems like the Road to Redemption is getting shorter by the minute. It took Marv Albert two full years! (as if that was enough) before NBC put him back on the air calling NBA games after he plead guilty to misdemeanor assault and battery when, during his felony trial for forcible sodomy, DNA tests proved that bite marks on the victim’s back were his. Now CNN will give Spitzer a show with convenient conservative columnist Kathleen Parker (formerly of the San Jose Mercury News, btw) after the whoring former gov blogged for Slate and analyzed for MSNBC. Sheesh.

Boston Massacre Has Implications for California

Wednesday, January 20th, 2010

060-238Whatever the loss of Ted Kennedy’s U.S. Senate seat means for the Democrats nationally and for President Obama – and they have no one to blame but themselves — this historic and politically crippling massacre  (see Jon Stewart’s takedown, the best political analysis out there) carries huge potential implications for California.

While no one expects U.S. Sen. Barbara Boxer to make the kind of rookie, dumbass, arrogant mistakes that Massachusetts Attorney Gen. Martha Coakley made (she’d better not suggest, for example, that Willie Mays played for the Dodgers)*, the election of Republican state legislator Scott Brown in a true-blue state like Massachusetts, suggests that anyone who looks or smells like an incumbent could be in trouble in 2010.

Scott-Brown_Hubba_copy

Senator Elect Scott Brown

No doubt, Republicans Hurricane Carly Fiorina and Caveman Chuck DeVore would have a harder time against the Democrat Boxer because as pro-life conservatives they’d have more trouble connecting to California independents.

But Tom Campbell is a horse of a different color. If he were to somehow pull out a victory in the GOP primary, the pro-choice, pro-gay rights, somewhat green, social moderate and fiscal conservative would be a genuine threat to Boxer – especially in light of the pitchfork-bearing quality of the Massachusetts vote.

Taking nothing for granted, Boxer has been raising money at a record pace for her: she brought in $1.8 million in the last three months of 2009, the campaign announced Tuesday, leaving Babs with $7.2 million in the bank at the end of the year.

The dynamics of the Massachusetts race have some potential implications for the California’s governor’s race as well. Whoever emerges from the Republican side – eMeg Whitman or Steve Commish Poisner – their goal will be to portray Attorney Gen. Jerry Brown as the insider who must be thrown out. Of course Jerry, the incumbent attorney general and former two-term governor, will do everything he can to portray himself as an outsider, newcomer and insurgent.barbara-boxer

And in both the Senate and governor’s race, we expect the Democrats to sound a lot like one of the roving 1886 lecturers cited in “The Populist Movement” by Duke historian Larry Goodwyn:

We have an overproduction of poverty, barefooted women, political thieves and many liars. There is no difference between legalized robbery and highway robbery . . . If you listen to other classes, you will have only three rights . . . to work, to starve and to die.

Boxer and Brown — we predict — will run against the banks, the corporations and the oil companies — all of which will be lashed to their GOP opponents.  Whether voters will buy it is anyone’s guess. The Coakley defeat will be massively overinterpreted by the national media (the best evidence is that it was mostly a case of a truly crappy Democratic campaign). But still, the Boston Massacre should be a cautionary tale for California Democrats.

061-460Here’s the secret agreement: Some of the sharpest react we heard from Monday’s story about the behind-the-scenes maneuvering over the Tranquillon Ridge project came over the Environmental Defense Center’s agreement to advocate for the PXP oil company project, while receiving a $100,000 payment for reimbursement of legal fees from the firm.

“I’ve never heard of any environmental non-profit doing anything remotely like this,” said Mark Massara, a former longtime attorney-advocate for the Sierra Club.

By popular demand, we’re posting the text in pdf of the April 2008 EDC-PXP agreement here, for those who want even more detail than we gave you in Monday’s 3,000-word opus.

conanMeanwhile, Back at the Ranch: While the rest of the world was pondering the fate of Haiti and the future of the Democratic Party and health reform, the folks over at Jerry Brown headquarters were consumed by the great debate that’s ragiing from Hollywood to Brentwood: Conan vs. Jay . . . And Steve the Commish Poizner popped a bit of good news: He’s won the endorsement of former Gov. George Deukmejian, who is much preferred among GOP conservatives to former Gov. Pete Wilson, who has endorsed eMeg.  Said Deukmejian: “Steve is the only candidate in this race with the right mix of experience, leadership, and vision to lead California back to economic prosperity.”. . . Minorities Need Apply: Good piece by Pete Carrillo and Orson Aguilar in the Mercury News noting that while “California reform-minded voters gave themselves the power to redraw legislative lines in California when they passed Proposition 11, the Voters First Act . . . an alarmingly low percentage of people of color is included in the pool of applicants from whom the 14 commissioners ultimately will be chosen. Less than 20 percent of that pool now is people of color, even though they make up 60 percent of California’s population.” . . . Condolences: We note with sadness the passing of Margaret Whitman, 89, of Lexington, Mass., mother of Meg Whitman.

_______________
* Some of Coakley’s mistakes: She said the Taliban were gone from Afghanistan. She said Red Sox hero Curt Schilling was a Yankee fan. And when asked why she was not spending more time with voters (Brown had stood outside Fenway Park greeting hockey fans who attended a special outdoor game between the Boston Bruins and the Philadelphia Flyers) Coakley said, “As opposed to standing outside Fenway Park? In the cold? Shaking hands?”