<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: eMeg Meltdown II &amp; What Poiz Will Renounce Next</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.calbuzz.com/2010/03/what-steve-will-disavow-next-emeg-meltdown-ii/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.calbuzz.com/2010/03/what-steve-will-disavow-next-emeg-meltdown-ii/</link>
	<description>Political news, analysis, cheap shots, commentary and more about California and beyond</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 07:04:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: SezMe</title>
		<link>http://www.calbuzz.com/2010/03/what-steve-will-disavow-next-emeg-meltdown-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-1932</link>
		<dc:creator>SezMe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 21:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.calbuzz.com/?p=6535#comment-1932</guid>
		<description>I have to jump on Ave7&#039;s bandwagon here.  Plante writes that Whitman&#039;s campaign &quot;...hit a roadblock&quot;.  Note the passive tense.  Better stated would be &quot;...created a roadblock&quot;.  Or better yet, &quot;...really effed up today&quot;.  But the worst part is the last paragraph.  Plante suggests this behavior is out of the ordinary while it is not.  If her media blockade is &quot;inexplicable&quot; then the fact that the Sun rose in the East this morning is inexplicable as well.

Shandobil&#039;s headline also takes the passive route, &quot;Whitman Press Event ... Goes Awry&quot;.  No it didn&#039;t.  They actively drove it off the road.

From my perspective, Whitman is paying a steeply discounted, e-Bay level price for her actions.

By the way, my pick is b).  She has to ask an aide whether to take questions at a presser?  Huh?  Her &quot;leadership&quot; mantra just rang more than a bit hollow.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to jump on Ave7&#8217;s bandwagon here.  Plante writes that Whitman&#8217;s campaign &#8220;&#8230;hit a roadblock&#8221;.  Note the passive tense.  Better stated would be &#8220;&#8230;created a roadblock&#8221;.  Or better yet, &#8220;&#8230;really effed up today&#8221;.  But the worst part is the last paragraph.  Plante suggests this behavior is out of the ordinary while it is not.  If her media blockade is &#8220;inexplicable&#8221; then the fact that the Sun rose in the East this morning is inexplicable as well.</p>
<p>Shandobil&#8217;s headline also takes the passive route, &#8220;Whitman Press Event &#8230; Goes Awry&#8221;.  No it didn&#8217;t.  They actively drove it off the road.</p>
<p>From my perspective, Whitman is paying a steeply discounted, e-Bay level price for her actions.</p>
<p>By the way, my pick is b).  She has to ask an aide whether to take questions at a presser?  Huh?  Her &#8220;leadership&#8221; mantra just rang more than a bit hollow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ave7</title>
		<link>http://www.calbuzz.com/2010/03/what-steve-will-disavow-next-emeg-meltdown-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-1931</link>
		<dc:creator>Ave7</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 17:20:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.calbuzz.com/?p=6535#comment-1931</guid>
		<description>Sorry guys but far from running Whitman&#039;s ship aground, most of the California press corps are acting like complete dullards in their handling of Meg-lomaniac.  The videos reveals that most the reporters in Oakland to be a pack of lambs who were passively led off to the slaughter.  

The aptly named &quot;Pompei&quot; created a PR disaster with her dishonest, rambling attempt to hide her candidate from the press, then Meg herself sat there in front of microphones ignoring questions at her own press conference, then Pompei&#039;s hired thug grabbed the press&#039; microphones and recorders while shouting &quot;thank you!&quot; and practically pushed them from the room with Meg smiling from the table -- and all the voters got was a Chron story, a couple of TV news stories, and a few blog entries?  Do you think Meg Whitman cares a lick about a fast-scrolling item on DC blog?  

California&#039;s reporters need to collectively wake up to their responsibilities, stop just &quot;getting what they can,&quot; and start demanding accountability from this &quot;front-runner&quot; -- loudly, in unison, on the record, and in Meg&#039;s face.  They need a coordinated strategy of attack to ensure that this conduct lands on the front page of California newspapers and the lead story on TV news -- statewide.  Only then will Meg-lomaniac start taking the press seriously.

The approach on the video, of threatening to leave because she won&#039;t answer reporter&#039;s questions, is missing the whole point (in fact it plays right into her strategy of using TV ads to define the public&#039;s understanding of her).  When a candidate for Governor of California refuses to answer questions from the press -- that IS the story.  (And where the hell are the Ed Boards?)

Ramp it up guys, this charade has gone on too long.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry guys but far from running Whitman&#8217;s ship aground, most of the California press corps are acting like complete dullards in their handling of Meg-lomaniac.  The videos reveals that most the reporters in Oakland to be a pack of lambs who were passively led off to the slaughter.  </p>
<p>The aptly named &#8220;Pompei&#8221; created a PR disaster with her dishonest, rambling attempt to hide her candidate from the press, then Meg herself sat there in front of microphones ignoring questions at her own press conference, then Pompei&#8217;s hired thug grabbed the press&#8217; microphones and recorders while shouting &#8220;thank you!&#8221; and practically pushed them from the room with Meg smiling from the table &#8212; and all the voters got was a Chron story, a couple of TV news stories, and a few blog entries?  Do you think Meg Whitman cares a lick about a fast-scrolling item on DC blog?  </p>
<p>California&#8217;s reporters need to collectively wake up to their responsibilities, stop just &#8220;getting what they can,&#8221; and start demanding accountability from this &#8220;front-runner&#8221; &#8212; loudly, in unison, on the record, and in Meg&#8217;s face.  They need a coordinated strategy of attack to ensure that this conduct lands on the front page of California newspapers and the lead story on TV news &#8212; statewide.  Only then will Meg-lomaniac start taking the press seriously.</p>
<p>The approach on the video, of threatening to leave because she won&#8217;t answer reporter&#8217;s questions, is missing the whole point (in fact it plays right into her strategy of using TV ads to define the public&#8217;s understanding of her).  When a candidate for Governor of California refuses to answer questions from the press &#8212; that IS the story.  (And where the hell are the Ed Boards?)</p>
<p>Ramp it up guys, this charade has gone on too long.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mitchell Rapp</title>
		<link>http://www.calbuzz.com/2010/03/what-steve-will-disavow-next-emeg-meltdown-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-1929</link>
		<dc:creator>Mitchell Rapp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 15:54:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.calbuzz.com/?p=6535#comment-1929</guid>
		<description>I know eMeg is rich, but does she need her Glamor Shot head shot to emulate a C Note?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know eMeg is rich, but does she need her Glamor Shot head shot to emulate a C Note?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pjhackenflack</title>
		<link>http://www.calbuzz.com/2010/03/what-steve-will-disavow-next-emeg-meltdown-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-1928</link>
		<dc:creator>pjhackenflack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 15:46:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.calbuzz.com/?p=6535#comment-1928</guid>
		<description>Who said anything about &quot;maturing&quot;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who said anything about &#8220;maturing&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jacksend</title>
		<link>http://www.calbuzz.com/2010/03/what-steve-will-disavow-next-emeg-meltdown-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-1927</link>
		<dc:creator>Jacksend</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 15:26:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.calbuzz.com/?p=6535#comment-1927</guid>
		<description>So let me get this straight, Jerry Brown &quot;maturing&quot; his positions is adapt or die brilliant strategy by a super duper smart politico, but Steve Poizner maturing his positions is fodder for mockery? Way to be consistent guys.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So let me get this straight, Jerry Brown &#8220;maturing&#8221; his positions is adapt or die brilliant strategy by a super duper smart politico, but Steve Poizner maturing his positions is fodder for mockery? Way to be consistent guys.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
