<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How Gov Candidates Sell Amid Doom and Gloom</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.calbuzz.com/2010/02/how-gov-candidates-sell-amid-doom-and-gloom/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.calbuzz.com/2010/02/how-gov-candidates-sell-amid-doom-and-gloom/</link>
	<description>Political news, analysis, cheap shots, commentary and more about California and beyond</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 20:01:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: SezMe</title>
		<link>http://www.calbuzz.com/2010/02/how-gov-candidates-sell-amid-doom-and-gloom/comment-page-1/#comment-1829</link>
		<dc:creator>SezMe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 22:03:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.calbuzz.com/?p=5518#comment-1829</guid>
		<description>This may seem like nit picking, but it really leads to a serious question.  You label 54% as &quot;a strong majority&quot;.  Really?  Seems like damn near a toss up to me.

But the serious point is how is one to judge whether any poll result is a strong majority or just a majority or a weak showing or whatever?  If measured against &quot;expectations&quot; just whose expectations get to set the benchmark?

As an aside, following on sqrjn&#039;s comment, with eMeg&#039;s countless consultants can&#039;t one of them tell her that standing around with a horse is not the best way to connect to the common man?  Or maybe they&#039;re all bunched up at the other end.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This may seem like nit picking, but it really leads to a serious question.  You label 54% as &#8220;a strong majority&#8221;.  Really?  Seems like damn near a toss up to me.</p>
<p>But the serious point is how is one to judge whether any poll result is a strong majority or just a majority or a weak showing or whatever?  If measured against &#8220;expectations&#8221; just whose expectations get to set the benchmark?</p>
<p>As an aside, following on sqrjn&#8217;s comment, with eMeg&#8217;s countless consultants can&#8217;t one of them tell her that standing around with a horse is not the best way to connect to the common man?  Or maybe they&#8217;re all bunched up at the other end.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sqrjn</title>
		<link>http://www.calbuzz.com/2010/02/how-gov-candidates-sell-amid-doom-and-gloom/comment-page-1/#comment-1828</link>
		<dc:creator>sqrjn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 16:07:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.calbuzz.com/?p=5518#comment-1828</guid>
		<description>Do you think Whitman matched her outfit to the horse or the horse to the outfit (and what kind of face is she making anyway) weird picture.

What I want to know is whether the AG&#039;s wife is professional enough to give him a reality check when neceesary, or whether they are more like to group think themselves into laced kool aid from a loving cup.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you think Whitman matched her outfit to the horse or the horse to the outfit (and what kind of face is she making anyway) weird picture.</p>
<p>What I want to know is whether the AG&#8217;s wife is professional enough to give him a reality check when neceesary, or whether they are more like to group think themselves into laced kool aid from a loving cup.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
