Does The Commish Have an Outside Game?
Meg Whitman’s capture of the influential endorsement of the Howard Jarvis Taxpayer’s Association is a big blow to Steve Poizner’s inside game campaign approach. So the key, emerging question for The Commish in the race for the Republican nomination for governor is: does he have an outside game?
For months, Poizner has pursued a tortoise-beats-the-hare game plan, patiently traveling the state, appearing at every conservative talk show and ed board that asked and rounding up grassroots endorsements from no-name local elected officials and GOP county committee chairmen.
All of which would be just ducky in giving him an organizational boost – if anybody had ever heard of the guy. As it is, Single Digit Steve is in danger of becoming the Willy Loman of Republican politics, selling his wares door-to-door in pursuit of a campaign of tactics, while eMeg blows him away with an on-the-airwaves strategic effort.
“Steve had a lot going for him, and hasn’t seemed to capitalize,” said one longtime, high-ranking Republican insider. “He has a very good message, is very focused, and would be a solid governor. But he’s played too much of the inside game and needs now to ramp up the outside game.”
It’s instructive on this point to read Steve Harmon’s intriguing piece about the state of the Poizner campaign in the Contra Costa Times. It’s hard to decide what was the worst news for Team Poizner in the Harmon report: a) that “wavering supporters” are criticizing the operation anonymously; b) that some of them even snitched out campaign intelligence to the Whitman camp or; c) that the grand strategy for the Commish is to win the primary with a last-month blitzgrieg broadcast attack on eMeg.
Calbuzz votes for c).
Steve Poizner is prepared to hold his fire against Meg Whitman…until the final month of the primary campaign, according to wavering supporters who were told of the strategy in an appeal for them to stay with him…
“It was fairly clear to me that they’re laying low and will continue to lay low until the final month,” (one such backer) added. “They may be proven to be a brilliant strategists (sic), but it’s making a lot of people nervous.”
As well it should.
With Poizner suffering a drip-drip-drip erosion of defecting supporters –- former Assembly GOP leader Sam Blakeslee, R-San Luis Obispo is just the latest –- the eMeg-will-save-us-all cry is getting stronger, a trend that Monday’s Jarvis endorsement will only encourage.
The endorsement’s nonsensical claim that Whitman is a better bet to hold the line on
taxes (no mention that relations between Poizner and the Jarvis group were strained by his shyness about going to the wallet to defeat Arnold’s special election initiatives last May) ignores the fact that it’s he him, not she her, who embraces across-the-board tax cuts; he him, not she her, who opposes Arnold’s big water bond; and he him, not she her, who denounces to the heavens eMeg campaign chairman Pete Wilson’s $7 billion record tax increase, back when PiWi was governor.
To our ears, it sounds like opportunistic Jarvis Association president Jon Coupal let the cat out of the bag during an interview with Bakersfield conservative yakker Inga Barks, a few hours after the endorsement was announced:
“The three scariest words in the California lexicon right now are ‘Governor Jerry Brown,’ and right now she is head to head in a Democrat state, the Rasumussen poll has it 43-to-43 Meg even with him. And that, I’ll tell you, we can have the best candidate in the world and what good is that if they can’t win?”
The Jarvis endorsement demonstrates that Whitman’s electability argument is proving at least as persuasive among movement types as Poizner’s effort to make the case for ideological purity.
The last time we checked, Poizner was down by 30 points with the clock running out. He might be able to get back in the game but not with his feckless four-corners offense. Time to fast break, play above the rim a little and toss up some three pointers, Commish.
At least we’re firs
t in something: At a time when California is circling the drain, it’s nice to know that the Golden State still earns its national trend-setting reputation on at least one score.
Recent days have brought a flurry of reports, like this, this and this, that the U.S. government is intractably broken. But as all good Calbuzzers know, California was wayyyyy ahead of the curve in being ungovernable.
Say it ain’t so, Your Megness: Whatsamatter — all your pink Lacostes were out to the laundry?
Grammatically speaking, shouldn’t that be “it is he, not she, who embraces across-the-board cuts…” rather than “it is him, not her…”?
To quote Ted Bernstein: “There can be no doubt that formal grammar demands the nominative case of a pronoun joined to the subject of a sentence by a copulative, or linking, verb.”
And I didn’t raise this point just so I could use “copulative” in a post.
yes — he and she. . . fixed
You are right on about about the Poizner campaign lacking a winnig publicly visible campaign and I, among several supporters, told them so repeatedly in no uncertain terms. I kind of figure that if Steve was willing to play with the big kahunas at the governor level…and Meg’s campaign dollar investment clearly puts her up there with the bigs…Steve had to match her spending level and he chose not to. So, he’s 30+ points down in the polls and some of his weaker supporters are abandoning him. Whether that decision of Steve’s is fatal or not to his campaign will be decided in June.
Your enthusiasm to point out Steve’s faltering campaign state of affairs missed recognizing some positive developments. The Team Brown and labor campaign ad attacks against Meg will improve Steve’s numbers. So will Steve’s handling of the Anthem insurance violation investigation and the resulting 800 charges. Finally, Steve’s endorsements are made up of not just low level GOP officials but include the greatest, the reliable and honest former governor of California, George Deukmejian.