<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Poizner vs. Poizner: Commish Faces His Own Record</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.calbuzz.com/2009/10/poizner-v-poizner-commish-faces-his-record-in-gop-bid/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.calbuzz.com/2009/10/poizner-v-poizner-commish-faces-his-record-in-gop-bid/</link>
	<description>Political news, analysis, cheap shots, commentary and more about California and beyond</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 23:33:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: killer</title>
		<link>http://www.calbuzz.com/2009/10/poizner-v-poizner-commish-faces-his-record-in-gop-bid/comment-page-1/#comment-1894</link>
		<dc:creator>killer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Feb 2010 16:32:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.calbuzz.com/?p=3138#comment-1894</guid>
		<description>So, let&#039;s see:  We have a choice between someone who calls herself a Republican but who is against the Second Amendment (even though she says she&#039;s for it, she condones the unconstitutional California gun control laws on the fake and proven-false theory that they keep the criminals at bay), who has contributed to Barbara Boxer and the preservation of the Delta smelt stopping the water in the San Joaquin Valley, who looks up to Van Jones, who has hired out-of-state media people to conduct her campaign instead of supporting the jobs in this state (as she says she is for - yeah, right), who is unwilling to meet the other candidate in an open debate, and who only started voting in the last five years . . . to someone who is strongly pro-Second Amendment, has decreased the operating budget of his own department by 15%, who is willing to debate with the other candidate, but who (as you say) has supported Al Gore (through his wife), has fought proposition 13 (per propaganda from the other candidate), who supposedly voted to increase taxes and who is pro gay marriage.  

Where does that leave we strong conservatives?  Seems like this slick newcomer with her blasphemous ads covering up her RINO ideals will win the day just because she has more money (even though the other is no slouch in the money dept either).  I say bring on the small candidates who don&#039;t necessarily have the money but who fully understand (as we other natives) what has happened to our state.  Hmmmm  we are one of the the most liberal state and yet we&#039;re bankrupt.  Please, somebody get us a true conservative candidate because yes, we do exist, and exist in great numbers, in California.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, let&#8217;s see:  We have a choice between someone who calls herself a Republican but who is against the Second Amendment (even though she says she&#8217;s for it, she condones the unconstitutional California gun control laws on the fake and proven-false theory that they keep the criminals at bay), who has contributed to Barbara Boxer and the preservation of the Delta smelt stopping the water in the San Joaquin Valley, who looks up to Van Jones, who has hired out-of-state media people to conduct her campaign instead of supporting the jobs in this state (as she says she is for &#8211; yeah, right), who is unwilling to meet the other candidate in an open debate, and who only started voting in the last five years . . . to someone who is strongly pro-Second Amendment, has decreased the operating budget of his own department by 15%, who is willing to debate with the other candidate, but who (as you say) has supported Al Gore (through his wife), has fought proposition 13 (per propaganda from the other candidate), who supposedly voted to increase taxes and who is pro gay marriage.  </p>
<p>Where does that leave we strong conservatives?  Seems like this slick newcomer with her blasphemous ads covering up her RINO ideals will win the day just because she has more money (even though the other is no slouch in the money dept either).  I say bring on the small candidates who don&#8217;t necessarily have the money but who fully understand (as we other natives) what has happened to our state.  Hmmmm  we are one of the the most liberal state and yet we&#8217;re bankrupt.  Please, somebody get us a true conservative candidate because yes, we do exist, and exist in great numbers, in California.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pjhackenflack</title>
		<link>http://www.calbuzz.com/2009/10/poizner-v-poizner-commish-faces-his-record-in-gop-bid/comment-page-1/#comment-1408</link>
		<dc:creator>pjhackenflack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 21:39:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.calbuzz.com/?p=3138#comment-1408</guid>
		<description>Cicero – Struggling with the time-space continuum, Poizner flack Jarrod Agen chronologically misspoke, and meant to say his boss “earlier” worked in the Bush adminstration, not “later.” Go figure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cicero – Struggling with the time-space continuum, Poizner flack Jarrod Agen chronologically misspoke, and meant to say his boss “earlier” worked in the Bush adminstration, not “later.” Go figure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cicero</title>
		<link>http://www.calbuzz.com/2009/10/poizner-v-poizner-commish-faces-his-record-in-gop-bid/comment-page-1/#comment-1401</link>
		<dc:creator>Cicero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 16:56:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.calbuzz.com/?p=3138#comment-1401</guid>
		<description>A couple of points:  Steve Poizner worked as a White House Fellow in 2001-2002, after George W. Bush&#039;s first election and well before his reelection.  So the statement that he worked in the Bush administration after his reelection over John Kerry is either a mistake by Calbuzz or by Poizner&#039;s flack.  Also, the statement that &quot;Steve was the contributor&quot; to the Gore recount effort and that he couldn&#039;t have put his wife&#039;s name down assumes that she has owns no share of the family&#039;s reported billion dollar wealth.  She can&#039;t write a check for $10,000?  If so, that&#039;s sad.  The fact is that he violated campaign finance laws if he was making the contribution &quot;on her behalf.&quot;  Steve Poizner is utterly lacking in principles and in qualifications to be governor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A couple of points:  Steve Poizner worked as a White House Fellow in 2001-2002, after George W. Bush&#8217;s first election and well before his reelection.  So the statement that he worked in the Bush administration after his reelection over John Kerry is either a mistake by Calbuzz or by Poizner&#8217;s flack.  Also, the statement that &#8220;Steve was the contributor&#8221; to the Gore recount effort and that he couldn&#8217;t have put his wife&#8217;s name down assumes that she has owns no share of the family&#8217;s reported billion dollar wealth.  She can&#8217;t write a check for $10,000?  If so, that&#8217;s sad.  The fact is that he violated campaign finance laws if he was making the contribution &#8220;on her behalf.&#8221;  Steve Poizner is utterly lacking in principles and in qualifications to be governor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
