<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Arnold&#8217;s “Legacy” Claim is a Fraud</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.calbuzz.com/2009/07/why-schwarzenegger%e2%80%99s-%e2%80%9clegacy%e2%80%9d-claim-is-a-fraud/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.calbuzz.com/2009/07/why-schwarzenegger%e2%80%99s-%e2%80%9clegacy%e2%80%9d-claim-is-a-fraud/</link>
	<description>Political news, analysis, cheap shots, commentary and more about California and beyond</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 21:59:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Westwood Oaks</title>
		<link>http://www.calbuzz.com/2009/07/why-schwarzenegger%e2%80%99s-%e2%80%9clegacy%e2%80%9d-claim-is-a-fraud/comment-page-1/#comment-1153</link>
		<dc:creator>Westwood Oaks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 04:41:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.calbuzz.com/?p=1899#comment-1153</guid>
		<description>Let&#039;s all move forward.  The best solution that I am aware of is a California constitutional convention. This is the best way we can fix the systemic problems for the next century of California governance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let&#8217;s all move forward.  The best solution that I am aware of is a California constitutional convention. This is the best way we can fix the systemic problems for the next century of California governance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Jaffe</title>
		<link>http://www.calbuzz.com/2009/07/why-schwarzenegger%e2%80%99s-%e2%80%9clegacy%e2%80%9d-claim-is-a-fraud/comment-page-1/#comment-1119</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Jaffe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 16:27:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.calbuzz.com/?p=1899#comment-1119</guid>
		<description>Referendum 1: require a balanced budget with contingency
Referendum 2: Re-install s part time legislature 
Referendum 3: No more gerrymandering
Referendum 4: Eliminate income tax, live on sales and real estate taxes</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Referendum 1: require a balanced budget with contingency<br />
Referendum 2: Re-install s part time legislature<br />
Referendum 3: No more gerrymandering<br />
Referendum 4: Eliminate income tax, live on sales and real estate taxes</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stevefromsacto</title>
		<link>http://www.calbuzz.com/2009/07/why-schwarzenegger%e2%80%99s-%e2%80%9clegacy%e2%80%9d-claim-is-a-fraud/comment-page-1/#comment-1116</link>
		<dc:creator>stevefromsacto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 23:13:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.calbuzz.com/?p=1899#comment-1116</guid>
		<description>Buried amid the rubble of the governor&#039;s budget agreement is one of the nastiest pieces of public policy in our state&#039;s history.

Hundreds of thousands of elderly, blind and disabled Californians and those who care for them will hereafter be treated as common criminals.  All of them will have to be fingerprinted, except, thankfully for amputees (I&#039;m surprised Arnold didn&#039;t call for retinal scans for these unfortunates). All care givers will have to get criminal background checks and, unlike state workers and others with far higher incomes, they will have to pay for the background checks themselves.

The reason: The governor&#039;s specious claim that there is &quot;massive&quot; fraud in the IHSS homecare program.  During the budget debate, Arnold claimed that some 25 percent of all IHSS claims are fraudulent.

But the figure seems to have been pulled out of thin air. &quot;I&#039;ve never had anyone tell me where that number comes from,&quot; Virginia Bella, the IHSS specialist in the nonpartisan Legislative Analyst&#039;s Office, told the Sacramento Bee. In fact, repeated investigations, including one conducted by Schwarzenegger&#039;s own &quot;Quality Assurance&quot; survey in 2007, have found the incidence of IHSS fraud in the program to be minimal - 1 percent at most.

Nevertheless, the governor, along with partisan ideologues and ambitious district attorneys have succeeded in branding some of California&#039;s most vulnerable citizens and those who care for them as fraud criminals. And gullible Democrats seeking illusionary budget savings, fell for it hook, line and sinker.

How low California has sunk!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Buried amid the rubble of the governor&#8217;s budget agreement is one of the nastiest pieces of public policy in our state&#8217;s history.</p>
<p>Hundreds of thousands of elderly, blind and disabled Californians and those who care for them will hereafter be treated as common criminals.  All of them will have to be fingerprinted, except, thankfully for amputees (I&#8217;m surprised Arnold didn&#8217;t call for retinal scans for these unfortunates). All care givers will have to get criminal background checks and, unlike state workers and others with far higher incomes, they will have to pay for the background checks themselves.</p>
<p>The reason: The governor&#8217;s specious claim that there is &#8220;massive&#8221; fraud in the IHSS homecare program.  During the budget debate, Arnold claimed that some 25 percent of all IHSS claims are fraudulent.</p>
<p>But the figure seems to have been pulled out of thin air. &#8220;I&#8217;ve never had anyone tell me where that number comes from,&#8221; Virginia Bella, the IHSS specialist in the nonpartisan Legislative Analyst&#8217;s Office, told the Sacramento Bee. In fact, repeated investigations, including one conducted by Schwarzenegger&#8217;s own &#8220;Quality Assurance&#8221; survey in 2007, have found the incidence of IHSS fraud in the program to be minimal &#8211; 1 percent at most.</p>
<p>Nevertheless, the governor, along with partisan ideologues and ambitious district attorneys have succeeded in branding some of California&#8217;s most vulnerable citizens and those who care for them as fraud criminals. And gullible Democrats seeking illusionary budget savings, fell for it hook, line and sinker.</p>
<p>How low California has sunk!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Alford</title>
		<link>http://www.calbuzz.com/2009/07/why-schwarzenegger%e2%80%99s-%e2%80%9clegacy%e2%80%9d-claim-is-a-fraud/comment-page-1/#comment-1115</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Alford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 23:10:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.calbuzz.com/?p=1899#comment-1115</guid>
		<description>Once again Calbuzz hits the nail on the head.  Good job. Arnold&#039;s a phony.  The recall didn&#039;t change a thing. His staff ought to know better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Once again Calbuzz hits the nail on the head.  Good job. Arnold&#8217;s a phony.  The recall didn&#8217;t change a thing. His staff ought to know better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ave7</title>
		<link>http://www.calbuzz.com/2009/07/why-schwarzenegger%e2%80%99s-%e2%80%9clegacy%e2%80%9d-claim-is-a-fraud/comment-page-1/#comment-1114</link>
		<dc:creator>Ave7</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 21:02:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.calbuzz.com/?p=1899#comment-1114</guid>
		<description>pdperry, that&#039;s such an important point!  Thank you for ignoring the thesis of this article and going so far out your way to trash a guy who is mentioned once, and whose quote you agree with.  Helps me to understand how Arnold got reelected.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>pdperry, that&#8217;s such an important point!  Thank you for ignoring the thesis of this article and going so far out your way to trash a guy who is mentioned once, and whose quote you agree with.  Helps me to understand how Arnold got reelected.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
