Press Clips: Chronicle Climbs Back in the Ring
Newsom vs. Newsom: Mega-kudos to Chronicler Carla Marinucci for leading the charge in her own newsroom to pull together a Page One takeout on Gavin Newsom’s exaggerated campaign claims about his record as San Francisco’s mayor.
The Wednesday piece occupied a big chunk of front page real estate, carried three bylines –- political scribbler Joe Garofoli and City Hall beat pounder Heather Knight teamed with the hardest working woman in show business –- and served as a marker to establish the fact that Newsom routinely overblows his accomplishments on the trail.
Most notably, the paper knocked down Prince Gavin’s oft-repeated claims that he balanced the city budget without tax increases and that every high school graduate in town is “guaranteed a college education.”
On other issues, however, the piece was hardly dispositive in its overreliance on he-said-he-said equivocation and the spin of Newsom handler Eric Jaye; a too-brief examination of Newsom’s signature health care program, for example, did establish that he tries to hog credit for it, but didn’t address the substantive question of whether or how well the damn thing works. Where’s the low-wage bus boy who can tell whether he now gets medical care or the restaurant owner who says what it’s doing to his business?
Hopefully, this is just the first of a series of “Newsom Watch” pieces that will drill down in detail on his record; like it or not, other California media, not to mention the voters, will rely on the paper to vet their guy as he tries to claim the governorship. In the same way that the L.A. Times would have been expected to perform a scorched earth number on Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa’s record had he decided to run, the Chron has front-line responsibility for holding Newsom accountable for his words and actions.
On Guard: Those seeking a fiercer test of Newsom’s campaign claims against his record are directed to a 4,147 word opus published by the weekly San Francisco Bay Guardian.
Granted, the Guardian is not exactly the Christian Science Monitor when it comes to unbiased journalism; editor and publisher Bruce Brugmann is famous for bragging on the advocacy stances of his paper’s “Print the news and raise hell” journalism. And its lefty agenda on issues from pot to public power may not be shared by the millions of mainstream California voters Newsom is out trying to woo.
Beyond the paper’s disagreements with Newsom over specific issues, however, city editor Steven T. Jones reported and wrote a helluva’ piece that also deals with more fundamental qualities of leadership –- political relations with the legislative branch, calculations about risking political capital and issues of transparency and secrecy, for example.
“The central persona being pushed by the Newsom campaign — that of a post partisan progressive who has united fractious San Francisco around innovative, common sense solutions to the most vexing problems using his considerable courage and political skills –- seems like pure fiction to most City Hall watchers,” Jones wrote.
“Newsom’s platform and persona are what voters want to hear right now — and they’re just believable enough to be an easy sell for modern media manipulators.”
Which is a good reason why the San Francisco media should keep chipping away at this key California political story.
Delay for gay marriage? Over at Politics Blog Chronster Garofoli has been closely tracking the debate within the gay community on whether to push a repeal-Prop. 8 initiative next year, or wait until the bigger turnout 2012 national election. As he reports here and here the advantage seems to rest with those in favor of holding off.
As a political matter, it’s an important decision that carries implications for next year’s campaign for governor, especially for Prince Gavin. He faces steep hill to climb in overcoming Attorney General Jerry Brown, and needs all the toe-holds he can find to do it; a 2010 gay marriage campaign could give a nice boost of passion to the Prince’s primary effort, allowing him to, um, marry his own effort to the energy and enthusiasm of a Prop. 8 repeal bid.
Notwithstanding Brown’s no-on-8 stand before California’s Supreme Court, despite the statewide vote in favor of the measure, Gavin’s out-of-left-field blessing of gay weddings in San Francisco set off the national debate of same-sex marriage, an historic and iconic action that trump’s General Jerry’s late-to-the-party stance. Whether you like it or not.
I commend your efforts to encourage the press to scrutinize the candidate’s records. Who is it that should be talking about Jerry Brown’s? I’m not talking about his record as Governor in the 1980’s; I’m talking about his record as Mayor of Oakland and as Attorney General. Admittedly, in this current position it is going to be difficult to find much of any record to write about. How about a comparison between what Jerry has been doing and what the past two Attorneys General in NY have done?
I’d like the name of the last mayor who has “united fractious San Francisco” around anything. While the Guardian does do some good reporting, it also views everyone and everything through its own progressive lens, which absolutely slants the stories. Also, the next political candidate who doesn’t exaggerate his achievements — and downplay his problems — will be the first. Hogging credit doesn’t make Newsom the Long Ranger.
To tellitlikeitis: I see your point about looking into Jerry Brown’s record – although I think his time as governor is more applicable than his work as mayor of Oakland in terms of historical evaluation – but why on earth would you suggest he be compared to Spitzer and Cuomo? Are you looking for scandals or enforcement or ??? It seems more relevant to look at his current job of being atty gen – and maybe compare him to his predecessors.